This article discusses the grand strategy imperatives of 37 foreign policy experts in Washington, DC. in response to President Donald Trump's nationalist challenge to the post-WWII international order concept. Using an abductive reconstructivist methodology to analyze in-depth interviews, five grand strategy imperatives or rules for action shared by all actors were identified: safeguarding US global leadership, maintaining alliances, securing US prosperity, value orientation, and the belief in a mission. Based on the interpretation of these rules for action, four types of foreign policy experts were distinguished: nationalists, realists, pragmatic liberals, and liberals. The latter three expert types, also labelled globalists, were united in their opposition to the nationalists' demolition of the international order but divided along partisan and ideological lines about the meaning and implementation of the rules for action. Realists, pragmatic liberals, and liberals were also unsure of how to explain and respond to Trump's nationalism beyond a defensive or wishful hope to save the vestiges of an US-centric international order. The findings demonstrate the value of in-depth qualitative interviews for explaining elite beliefs, illustrating the rich insights for policy analysis that can be gained through this methodology.
• 您的宗教机构/社区领袖(神父、牧师或其他宗教领袖)的声明(附录 A); • 证明您的信仰与宗教/信仰相关的文件或其他证据,和/或解释该信仰如何不允许您接种 COVID-19 疫苗; • 与您当前其他宗教习俗有关的证据,表明您的信仰始终如一。 通过在下方签名,我证明我提供的信息截至此请求之日均准确无误。 我理解,如果我为支持此请求而提供的任何信息是虚假或误导性的,我可能会受到纪律处分,包括终止雇佣关系或被温尼伯大学开除(如适用)。
2024 年 4 月 15 日 — 根据伪证处罚规定,我声明我已检查过此纳税申报表及随附的附表和报表,并且据我所知和所信……
1. 描述您反对接种疫苗要求的性质。 2. 遵守疫苗接种要求会如何严重影响您的宗教活动? 3. 您反对的宗教信仰持续了多久? 4. 描述您成年后是否接种过任何其他疾病的疫苗(例如流感、麻疹、腮腺炎和风疹 (MMR) 以及 Tdap (百日咳))。 5. 如果您不反对接种所有疫苗,请解释为什么您的反对仅限于 COVID-19 疫苗。 6. 描述您是否因为反对的宗教信仰而不使用任何其他药品或产品。