何时将土豆停止成为土豆？这个问题至少在今年至少一段时间里困扰着英国一些最好的法律思维。下一月，阿尔法维尔（Ft Alphaville）对读者进行了3,400个walkers零食零食有限公司v专员的脆脆单词，以获得Majestion的收入和海关的税收，这是一个案例税务税务的税收 - 使沃克斯（Walkers）的税收征服范围 - 造成范围的范围 - 造成范围的范围 - 以标准的20％责任的拍打感觉罂粟是因为它们属于非豁免类别，其中包括：土豆薯片，土豆棍，土豆，土豆泡菜和用土豆制成的类似产品，或用土豆面粉，土豆粉，土豆starchwalkers，试图避免征收的产品实际上避免使用更多的产品，实际上是对Zero popadomp的影响，这些产品实际上是Zero Zero facseal asso facseal asso coperaff的。在我们出版的一年多后，Walkers和HMRC再次出庭，前者在上层法庭面前提起了FTT的判决。 A judgment landed on Friday — did Walkers finally get the run of HMRC, or was the crisps giant left feeling salty?You say potato, we say warzoneTo rapidly summarise a complicated courtroom clash, Walkers tried the following arguments to get Sensations Poppadoms off the VAT hook:They are not ready for human consumptionThey are not a potato productThey don’t *taste* like a potato productThey’re not like crispsThey’re not like crisps because they’re part of a mealThey’re not like crisps because they aren’t packaged like crispsThey’re not like crisps because they are called poppadomsThey’re not like crisps because they don’t look like crispsThey’re not like crisps because they don’t work like crispsThey’re not like crisps because they don’t do the same things in your mouth that crisps doThey’re not like crisps because the public doesn’t think of them like crispsTaxing Sensations Poppadoms but not conventional Poppadoms将扭曲英国市场，以适当地