• WD “Dee” Hilton Jr.(主席) • Bobby Stovall 法官(亨特县法官) • Randy Tarpley(Tarpley Agencies) • James Grove Sr.(L3 Harris 高级总监) • Summer Spurlock(格林维尔市经理) • Greg Sims(格林维尔市董事会主席
Furman v. Georgia , 403 U.S. 238 (1972) ................................................................................... 8 Graham v. Florida , 560 U.S. 48 (2010) ................................................................................... 10 Gregg v. Georgia , 428 U.S. 153 (1976) ..................................................................................... 8 Harmelin v. Michigan , 501 U.S. 957 (1991) .............................................................................. 9 In re Pers.Restraint of Monschke , 482 P.3d 276 (2021) ............................................................ 6 Miller v. Alabama , 567 U.S. 460 (2012) ............................................................................ passim Offut v. United States , 348 U.S. 11 (1954) ............................................................................... 17 People v. Bullock , 440 Mich. 15 (1992) ........................................................................... 2, 9, 10 People v. Johnson , 549 P.3d 985 (2024) .................................................................................. 17 People v. Lorentzen , 387 Mich. 167 (1972)................................................................................ 9 People v. Parks , 510 Mich. 225 (2022) ............................................................................. passim People v. Stovall , 987 N.W.2d 85 (Mich. 2022) ......................................................................... 9 Roper v. Simmons , 543 U.S. 551(2005)..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Statev。Bassett,418 P.3d 343(2018).............................................................................................................................................................................................................
Kaiden Joseph Knight Allison Marie Kraus With Highest Distinction Corrin Nicole Larson Malaya Lee Kinley M. Ligon Audrey Loney Bonnie Grace Marcelo Shelby Mattingly Laura K. McAninch Nikolaus Jens-Uwe McCraig Nasya Ann McGee James Campbell McGookey Sarah Mae Miller Sydni Christine Money Leah Nelson Drew Newlin Gabriella Renee O'Dell Danielle E. Patrick Nicolas Patterson Elexis Kye Rigney Billy Rios Aguilar Meaghan Meaghan Cecilia Rohan Lauren Ruren Ruth Rutter Genessis Cecilia Cecilia Cecilia Cecilia Salinas Delgado Salinas Delgado Shortridge Lucy Layne Smith Katie Lee Stovall Michael Robert Surridge* I ' yonna L. Sykes Kenan Tinnin Lilly Tomandl Alexander Toms Drayton Jumai Travis Gillian Underhill Tristan Ruth Van Deuren Tran Huynh Vo Claire Watkins Wallace* Chelsie M. Walsman Kenzie Grace Wangstrom Lillian Jo Wasemann Sam Wessel Elizabeth Lee West Trent Wilhelm Rylee Jeanette Williams Williams Becky Wilson Ami Jo Wooten Connor C. Wright
莫莉·伊丽莎白·德尔普(Molly Elizabeth delp)教育/英语“可能有利于您的赔率!”A Pedagogical Approach to Dystopian Literature 2013 Emily Hill Education/English Examing the Notion of Marital Entrapment Found in the Bronte Literature 2014 Teresa K. Fuller Education/General Science Knowledge and Usage of Teaching Models in Northeast Arkansas 1996 Jennifer Birge Education/General Science The Design of a Virtual Science Fair 2000 Hannah Beth Wright Education/General Science Student Success and Motivation in Online Versus Traditional Lecture Classes 2013年杰西卡·厄琳·斯托沃尔教育/数学技术在融合与差异之间的良好界限2004 Courtney Briney教育/数学技术对幻想棒球2012 Jennifer Walker教育/中级徒步旅行徒步旅行贸易书籍的统计分析2016年梅雷德斯·沃特沃思教育/中级教育/中级教育范围徒步旅行:教育/中级写作我的自我:通过真实的修订2019
2.例如,违反第四修正案搜查令要求而获取的证据必须予以压制。Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 654-55 (1961).违反刑事被告第五修正案权利而获取的陈述应当予以压制。Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 444 (1966).此外,非自愿的陈述在审判阶段不予保留。例如,参见 Colorado v. Connelly, 479 U.S. 157, 167 (1986); Miller v. Fenton, 474 U.S. 104, 109-10 (1986); Brown v. Mississippi, 297 U.S. 278, 286-87 (1936).此外,侵犯被告人获得律师辩护的权利而获取的刑事被告人的陈述应当被禁止。Brewer v. Williams, 430 U.S. 387, 400-01 (1977); Massiah v. United States, 377 U.S. 201, 207 (1964).如果目击者对被告人的身份证明是在侵犯被告人获得律师辩护的权利的情况下取得的,则必须禁止获取有关该目击者身份证明的证词。Kirby v. Illinois, 406 U.S. 682, 689-90 (1972); United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218, 227 (1967).当目击者指认被告的证词违反正当程序时,也必须禁止该证词。Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98, 112-13 (1977); Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293, 301-02 (1967).
2. 例如,违反第四修正案搜查令要求而获取的证据必须予以隐匿。马普诉俄亥俄州,367 US 643, 654-55 (1961)。违反第五修正案规定而获取的刑事被告人的权利的陈述应当予以隐匿。米兰达诉亚利桑那州,384 US 436, 444 (1966)。此外,非自愿的陈述在审判阶段不得保留。参见,例如,科罗拉多诉康奈利,479 US 157, 167 (1986);米勒诉芬顿,474 US 104, 109-10 (1986);布朗诉密西西比州,297 US 278, 286-87 (1936)。此外,违反其获得律师辩护的权利而获取的刑事被告人的陈述应当予以隐匿。 Brewer v. Williams, 430 US 387, 400-01 (1977); Massiah v. United States, 377 US 201, 207 (1964). 如果目击者指认被告的证词侵犯了被告聘请律师的权利,则必须禁止该证词。Kirby v. Illinois, 406 US 682, 689-90 (1972); United States v. Wade, 388 US 218, 227 (1967). 如果指认程序违反了正当法律程序,则必须禁止该证词。Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 US 98, 112-13 (1977); Stovall v. Denno, 388 US 293, 301-02 (1967).
w棕色领导学院Quest Quest campus pre-k thru 8 w棕色领导学院创世记校园校园pre-k thru 5 a+学院戴维斯·H·斯·阿尔丁·阿尔丁·阿尔丁·伊斯丁·霍尔成功学院阿尔丁·斯托瓦尔·斯托瓦尔中部奥尔丁·霍夫曼中部阿尔丁·阿尔丁·阿尔丁·阿尔丁·伊斯特·格兰瑟姆学院Aldine isd plummer中间阿尔丁·阿尔迪恩·艾迪斯·刘易斯·刘易斯·刘易斯·弗里斯·弗里斯·弗里斯·弗里斯·艾尔丁·阿尔迪恩·阿尔丁 ALDINE ISD STEHLIK EL ALDINE ISD CARAWAY EL ALDINE ISD OGDEN EL ALICE ISD ALICE H S ALIEF ISD SNEED EL ALIEF ISD BEST EL ALIEF ISD BUSH EL ALIEF ISD COLLINS EL AMARILLO ISD FANNIN MIDDLE AMARILLO ISD SAN JACINTO EL ANNA ISD ROSAMOND-SHERLEY EL ARLINGTON ISD SAM HOUSTON H S ARLINGTON ISD CARTER J H ARLINGTON ISD工人J H阿灵顿ISD Blanton El Arlington ISD Speer El Arlington ISD Thornton El Arlington ISD Goodman El Arlington El Arlington ISD教皇El Arlington ISD FOSTER EL ARLINGTON ISD EL ARLINGOD EL ARLINGOD EL ARLINGTON ISD