屡获殊荣的保险行业战略合作伙伴,在阿联酋、沙特阿拉伯、巴基斯坦、埃及和英国拥有约 200 名优秀员工,推动创新并为全球业务合作伙伴提供尖端解决方案。我们努力确保提供最优质的解决方案,将我们的经验和行业知识转化为客户的价值。
密歇根州莫利纳医疗保健880 West Long Lake Road Troy,MI 48098(248)925-1700(888)898-7969 http://www.molinahealthcare.com/
首先查看用于披露的指标,最普遍的指标是总排放量,并伴随着全部或每个总排放区域(GFA)的全部或一部分的强度度量。然而,整个样本中列出了八个以上的总13个指标,在各个区域之间具有不同的偏好。在美国,使用的最常见的度量是每平方英尺二氧化碳(mtco2e/sf),而在日本和欧洲和欧洲千克和米的平方更为普遍。虽然难以直接比较,但一旦缩放,这些指标是可比的。没有看到的其他指标,例如没有随附的GFA披露和每收入排放的总排放量。总共有10%的样本没有披露足够水平的信息来以每个楼层空间的总排放形式产生可比的排放度量。图5显示了直接按地区披露可比较排放指标的公司的比例。
对26家公司分析的保险收入增长了22%,达到2024年H1的1,74亿迪拉姆,而上一时期则增长了143亿迪拉姆。最高线,曾经是阿联酋保险业的自豪感和竞争,不再被报道为GWP。相反,现在显示为保险收入,类似于赚取的保费。关键区别在于,它是预期的信贷损失的净值,类似于有可疑债务的规定。
1. Executive Summary When the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or Agency) takes an action on a pesticide registration ( e.g., registers a pesticide or reevaluates it in registration review) under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), the Agency is responsible under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) to ensure that the action is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of federally threatened or endangered (referred to as “listed”) species, or result in the destruction or adverse modification of their designated critical habitats. Chemical stressors, such as pesticides, are one of many factors that can contribute to population declines of listed species. Meeting this ESA responsibility is a formidable task, considering the tens of thousands of pesticide products and registration amendments for which EPA is required to review the potential effects for over 1,700 U.S. listed species. Given these challenges, in April 2022, EPA released a workplan (USEPA, 2022a) and an update to the workplan in November 2022 (USEPA, 2022b) that describe how it plans to meet its ESA obligations as part of pesticide registration processes under FIFRA. The update also describes strategies for identifying early mitigation measures to address potential population-level impacts to listed species across groups of chemicals ( e.g ., herbicides, rodenticides, insecticides) or in certain regions of the U.S. These strategies intend to more efficiently determine whether, how much, and where mitigations may be needed to protect listed species from many uses of conventional pesticides. This final Herbicide Strategy is another key step in meeting this goal. This Herbicide Strategy covers only conventional herbicides - an important, widely used tool for growers to prevent or eliminate weeds that compete with crops for light, moisture, and nutrients. EPA focused the strategy on agricultural uses in the lower 48 states because hundreds of millions of pounds of herbicides (and plant growth regulators) are applied each year (USEPA, 2017), which is substantially more than for non-agricultural uses and for other pesticide classes ( e.g. , insecticides, fungicides). In addition, there are hundreds of species listed by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS) 1 in the contiguous U.S. The mitigations identified in the strategy would address potential impacts to listed plants (terrestrial, wetland, and aquatic), which are the types of species likely to be most impacted by herbicides. By identifying mitigations to protect plants, listed animal species that depend on plants would also be protected. This includes animals that depend on plants for food and shelter (habitat). By identifying and defining mitigations for these listed plant and animal species, EPA will consider and apply this final Herbicide Strategy as appropriate in FIFRA actions, which should result in reductions of population-level impacts to over 900 listed species in the lower 48 states. The Herbicide Strategy is intended to create a consistent, reasonable, transparent, and understandable approach to assess potential impacts and identify mitigations to reduce potential population-level impacts to listed species from the use of agricultural herbicides. The strategy does not include ESA effects determinations, but instead is meant to identify proactive mitigations that can be applied in registration and registration review actions to reduce pesticide impacts to listed species. The strategy is intended to provide similar and consistent mitigations for herbicides with similar characteristics ( e.g. ,
ACE-17,我们的旗舰IFRS 17计算引擎,提供了一种无缝且具有成本效益的解决方案,以生成IFRS 17财务和披露,从而节省了您在IFRS 17报告过程中的时间和精力。用户可以通过直观,完全透明且灵活的计算过程进行构建,该过程旨在生成所有报告要求以交付IFRS 17财务报表。
Morgan Stanley的单Leg选项路由器可在每个美国列出的期权交易所中访问单腿期权市场。对于可销售的和不可销售的客户订单,Osort旨在捕获美国列出的期权交易所中受保护报价的同时快照,Morgan Stanley的市场对交流的报价以及主要流动性来构建可用流动性的观点。Morgan Stanley使用直接的市场数据提要和/或期权价格报告局(OPRA)提要,以获取每个交易所在给定安全性的受保护报价。Morgan Stanley还可以使用这些直接市场数据源来为每个安全性获得多个市场数据深度。一旦构建了可用流动性的观点,OSORT可以直接或通过交易所的路由功能,访问交换流动性和/或访问本金流动性。在订单或市场上有某些变化的前提下,将在订单的寿命中重新评估营销性和流动性的可用性。
MEDIA RELEASE Larger Listed Companies on Track for Mandatory Climate Reporting in FY 2025 – Study by ACRA and NUS Singapore, 8 July 2024 – A study by the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority (ACRA) and the Sustainable and Green Finance Institute (SGFIN) at the National University of Singapore found that larger listed companies, 78% of which are from the carbon-intensive sectors 1 , are making good progress in climate reporting.该研究还建议采取策略来加强与气候相关的披露,以满足投资者的期望和强制性报告要求。2,由第二次财政部长,财政部供应委员会的Chee Hong Tat先生将于2024年2月,新加坡将引入强制性气候报告,以帮助公司与新加坡国家关于可持续发展的国家议程相符。强制性气候报告将以分阶段的方式实施,将从2025年开始,并使用国际可持续性标准委员会(ISSB)一致的要求进行了上市发行人的报告。较大的非上市公司将从2027财政年度开始报告,但一些例外。与与气候相关的财务披露(TCFD)框架表现紧密的公司将有充分的位置,以满足与ISSB一致的报告要求。3,由ACRA与SGFIN的研究分支机构Sean Shin博士一起进行的研究检查了2022财政年度的51个较大列出的发行人3中的第2次,基于气候相关的金融披露工作组(TCFD)框架。关键发现包括:
宾汉姆大学卡鲁,纳萨拉瓦州。电子邮件:clemokeke@gmail.com。电话号码:+234 8033824631 摘要 在过去的四十年里,信息和通信技术 (ICT) 对公司业绩的影响已成为活跃研究的主题。本研究的目的是审查 ICT 对消费品行业公司财务业绩的影响,该业绩以资本使用回报率 (ROCE) 衡量,并将公司规模作为控制变量。在 2013 年至 2022 年的十年 (10) 年间,该研究使用了尼日利亚十三 (13) 家上市消费品公司。研究采用了事后研究方法,并从公司报告期间的年度报告中收集了二手数据。使用 EViews 12 版进行相关性和回归分析。研究结果表明,ICT 硬件融资 (FICTH) 和 ICT 软件融资 (FICTS) 对尼日利亚上市消费品公司的财务业绩产生负面且微不足道的影响。研究表明,利益相关者,尤其是消费品行业的管理者,在冒险采购任何额外的计算机硬件或软件之前,应始终仔细审查所有选择,同时牢记其 ROCE 的负面影响。关键词:信息和通信技术 (ICT)、资本使用回报率、引言当今的商业世界面临着各种各样的挑战,因为不断变化的经济变量影响着管理者和企业经营者做出的每一项商业决策和行动。Mahboub (2018) 引用 Talegeta (2014) 的观点,认为当今的商业环境极其活跃且庞大,由于创造力、普遍竞争、知识的快速传播、持续的技术进步、创新、意识的增强和客户的需求而迅速变化。在商业世界(包括消费品公司)面临的所有这些挑战中,Jun 等人(2010 年)引用 Kim 等人(2009 年)的记录,认为投资信息技术被广泛认为具有降低成本和获得竞争优势的巨大潜力。这项研究与 Ju 等人(2010 年)的观点一致,他们认为,关于投资信息技术是否能提高生产率的争论越来越多。过去大量的研究 ICT
