随着IRA的通过,包括礼拜堂在内的非营利组织现在可以通过一个名为“直接薪酬”的计划更容易获得清洁能源资金和现金折扣,通常称为选修费。在IRA之前,只有税收责任的房主和商业实体在安装太阳能电池板,风力涡轮机或其他合格财产上的其他合格技术时可以要求投资税收抵免。现在,直接薪酬选项意味着非税收实体也可以从直接薪金回扣期权中受益。2021年11月签署为法律的基础设施投资和就业法案(IIJA)也提供了一些投资,以减少温室气体排放并提高对气候影响的韧性。IIJA在五年内为新计划(Renew America's Notofits计划)提供了5000万美元的能源部。该计划将为非营利组织提供多达20万美元的赠款,以提高其设施的能源效率。本文档未提供有关2023年美国续签美国能源部计划的指导。该计划的提案由科罗拉多大学博尔德大学(CUB)与联合卫理公会的山天空年度会议以及其他组织合作。该提案要求提供4,000,000美元的赠款,该赠款将在合格的非专业组织中共享,以追溯其设施。在该项目的一生中,DOE将确定400个设施,每年有25%的这些设施由弱势社区拥有和经营。山上的天空会议和幼崽被授予了每年四年中包括教堂在内的20个非专用设施的赠款。本赠款中包括的地理区域包括科罗拉多州,怀俄明州,犹他州,新墨西哥州,爱达荷州和蒙大拿州。山天空会议气候司法委员会将与单个教会合作。
减少销售电话中传统AI生成的响应系统中的延迟延迟通常会延迟延误,通常需要至少4秒钟才能完成完整的过程。此故障通常包括三个耗时的步骤:1)语音到文本(STT)的700ms; 2)2秒用于AI响应产生; 3)文本到语音(TTS)的400ms。此外,如果AI需要利用检索增强生成(RAG)技术来访问更多的内部知识,则AI响应时间可以扩展到4-6秒,从而导致等待时间约为5-7秒。这个等待时间通常会导致客户不耐烦和不满,从而难以保留和吸引客户。为了解决这个问题,我们引入了几种旨在减少AI生成的响应延迟的技术解决方案,从而改善了客户体验。利用GPT-4流式传输模式和句子级TT,我们可以将响应时间缩短约1秒。此外,通过与现有响应的并发匹配,可以更减少响应时间。如果找到了匹配项,则系统直接向客户提供了预录的语音响应,绕过需要等待GPT-4的响应的需求。如果找不到匹配,则系统使用过渡单词为GPT-4购买时间来生成适当的响应。这种方法允许仅1秒钟的响应时间而无需TT。GPT-4流式模式和句子级tts: - AI系统在流模式下通过单词返回响应。- 系统从首先返回的响应中播放音频。- 收到AI的流响应后,呼叫系统将单词结合到句子中,并使用TTS将其转换为音频。此方法将响应时间从1.5秒减少到大约1.2秒的一般答案,从4-6秒到回收增强发电(RAG)答案的4-6秒至1.6秒。chat和常见问题的并发API响应: - 呼叫系统同时触发两个API呼叫:一个用于聊天,一个用于FAQ/TRUSTINTION。通常,常见问题解答响应更快,如果客户的问题与预设的常见问题相匹配,则系统会播放本地预先录制的音频。- 如果没有匹配,系统使用本地存储的过渡短语,为GPT -4提供了额外的时间来生成详细的响应。此过程允许在没有TT的情况下仅1秒钟的响应时间。常见问题系统系统和缓存: - 常见问题及其高质量答案存储在常见问题解答系统中。- 随着系统的运行,更多的常见问题被缓存,增加了快速匹配的可能性。
肥皂的历史据信,发现第一批肥皂是偶然的,名字归因于一个罗马传奇,大约在莫罗·索波(Morro Do Sapo)附近的公元前1000年,在河流的小支流中,在河流的小支流中,在一个宗教场所下方,他们的衣服变得清晰起来。 水。清洁剂是由动物脂肪与木灰混合并穿透粘土质土壤形成的。据信,肥皂靠近当前的肥皂,起源于公元前600年的腓尼基人。将山羊猪肉用木灰煮沸,获得奶油肥皂[1]。最有趣的是,“肥皂”一词在几种语言中相似:Sapone(意大利语),Savon(法语),Seife(德语),Saippua(Finnish),Szappan(匈牙利语)。在第一次世界大战中,粮食短缺,因此是
1. Executive Summary When the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or Agency) takes an action on a pesticide registration ( e.g., registers a pesticide or reevaluates it in registration review) under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), the Agency is responsible under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) to ensure that the action is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of federally threatened or endangered (referred to as “listed”) species, or result in the destruction or adverse modification of their designated critical habitats. Chemical stressors, such as pesticides, are one of many factors that can contribute to population declines of listed species. Meeting this ESA responsibility is a formidable task, considering the tens of thousands of pesticide products and registration amendments for which EPA is required to review the potential effects for over 1,700 U.S. listed species. Given these challenges, in April 2022, EPA released a workplan (USEPA, 2022a) and an update to the workplan in November 2022 (USEPA, 2022b) that describe how it plans to meet its ESA obligations as part of pesticide registration processes under FIFRA. The update also describes strategies for identifying early mitigation measures to address potential population-level impacts to listed species across groups of chemicals ( e.g ., herbicides, rodenticides, insecticides) or in certain regions of the U.S. These strategies intend to more efficiently determine whether, how much, and where mitigations may be needed to protect listed species from many uses of conventional pesticides. This final Herbicide Strategy is another key step in meeting this goal. This Herbicide Strategy covers only conventional herbicides - an important, widely used tool for growers to prevent or eliminate weeds that compete with crops for light, moisture, and nutrients. EPA focused the strategy on agricultural uses in the lower 48 states because hundreds of millions of pounds of herbicides (and plant growth regulators) are applied each year (USEPA, 2017), which is substantially more than for non-agricultural uses and for other pesticide classes ( e.g. , insecticides, fungicides). In addition, there are hundreds of species listed by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS) 1 in the contiguous U.S. The mitigations identified in the strategy would address potential impacts to listed plants (terrestrial, wetland, and aquatic), which are the types of species likely to be most impacted by herbicides. By identifying mitigations to protect plants, listed animal species that depend on plants would also be protected. This includes animals that depend on plants for food and shelter (habitat). By identifying and defining mitigations for these listed plant and animal species, EPA will consider and apply this final Herbicide Strategy as appropriate in FIFRA actions, which should result in reductions of population-level impacts to over 900 listed species in the lower 48 states. The Herbicide Strategy is intended to create a consistent, reasonable, transparent, and understandable approach to assess potential impacts and identify mitigations to reduce potential population-level impacts to listed species from the use of agricultural herbicides. The strategy does not include ESA effects determinations, but instead is meant to identify proactive mitigations that can be applied in registration and registration review actions to reduce pesticide impacts to listed species. The strategy is intended to provide similar and consistent mitigations for herbicides with similar characteristics ( e.g. ,
要使人工智能符合道德规范并公平公正,仅使用无偏见的数据是不够的。算法的设计也应使其能够持续动态地检查是否存在偏见。如果审核失败,应消除发现的任何偏见,并在部署算法之前对其进行修复
技术合作、培训和技术转让服务侧重于灾害评估和减灾,将其作为环境评估、自然资源评估和项目制定过程的要素。技术合作集中于灾害和脆弱性评估、将减灾措施纳入投资项目制定、使用地理信息系统进行制图和分析以及城市流域规划以进行灾害和资源管理。培训包括灾害减灾和综合发展规划等各个方面的讲习班和正式课程。几乎每个成员国的人员都接受了新的灾害管理技能培训。迄今为止,技术转让侧重于建立应急信息管理系统,包括提供设备和人员培训。将自然灾害管理作为发展规划的要素,可以有效减少灾害的影响,这一点已得到受援国和其他国际组织的确认。
我们认识到,尊重的是,祖先领土涵盖现在被称为卑诗省的每一英寸的第一个国家的固有权利和头衔,包括其土地,自我决心,健康和健康的未经证实的权利。植根于土地的法律和治理制度维持了数千年的这些不同国家的主权。原住民对其祖先领土的权利和责任在大多数情况下从未被割让或投降,并且在省,民族和国际法中维持。这些权利反映在历史和现代条约中,《加拿大宪法》第35条,法院裁决,《联合国土著人民权利2》以及加拿大诉讼呼吁采取行动的真相与和解委员会宣言。3