法律审查通过其全部出版物采取平权行动,诉讼,密歇根大学及其密歇根州法律审查协会(Michigan Law Review Association)正在面临教师,校友和学生对种族偏好对诉讼审查的诉讼和诉讼的诉讼方面的诉讼和性行为的诉讼的联邦公民权利诉讼。美国第一法律基金会提起的未决诉讼指控密歇根州法律审查在选择学生编辑和文章时考虑了种族和性别,这违反了《公民权利法》的《平等保护条款》和第六章。 Michigan law also prohibits discrimination on the basis of race in higher education.The plaintiffs are three tenured law professors who are all white, heterosexual men and thus not members of the groups allegedly favored by the law review.According to the complaint, the review employs two different review tracks for choosing new members: 40 percent of applicants are chosen solely based on application exercise scores, while the other 60 percent go through a “holistic review” that includes personal statements法索普认为,没有固定的加权系统来说明整体审查过程的各个方面。这不仅会影响申请人的评论,还会影响故事的选择。首选群体撰写的故事比异性恋,非转变者,白人男人的客观上更强烈提交。投诉名称密歇根大学和密歇根大学法律评论是被告,列出了该评论维持社论政策和标准,这些政策和标准通过散文促使妇女和/或种族少数群体通过提示来揭示这些特征来揭示这些特征。 7月,双方同意从“不偏见”中删除大学摄政王和法律审查的个人审查,我