机构名称：
¥ 30.0
4。索赔人的案例是，由于Wirsol违反了EPC合同，太阳能公园包含缺陷。索赔人索赔（作为SPV索赔的受让人）损害了这些缺陷。所寻求的损害包括据称对太阳能公园投资的案件的索赔，以及SPVS的控股公司为借贷而产生的费用的损害赔偿。在SPVS终止EPC合同后，在紧接SPV终止之后的时期内，WIRSOL的操作和维护协议（“ O＆M协议”）也提出了索赔。此外，根据出售和购买协议，索赔人对违反保修的索赔要求其集团获得太阳能公园。The Claimants claim approximately £7 million compensation for alleged defects in the solar park, a further £6.8 million (or more) for ‘blight', £8.8 million alleged losses on a refinancing said to have been necessary by reason of the alleged defects, £2.5 million for the loss of an option over adjoining land at a site at Outwood, and a number of ancillary claims, making a total of around £28 million.
高等法院判决模板
主要关键词
相关文件推荐
