1 骨肿瘤学和罕见肿瘤中心,IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo Per Lo Studio Dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”,意大利梅尔多拉 47014; alessandro.devita@irst.emr.it (ADV); giacomo.miserocchi@irst.emr.it(总经理) valentina.fausti@irst.emr.it (VF); chiara.spadazzi@irst.emr.it (客户服务); claudia.cocchi@irst.emr.it (抄送); chiara.liverani@irst.emr.it (中文); chiara.calabrese@irst.emr.it (抄送); lorena.gurrieri@irst.emr.it(LG); alberto.bongiovanni@irst.emr.it (AB); laura.mercatali@irst.emr.it (LM)2 病理科,Morgagni-Pierantoni 医院,意大利弗利 47121; federica.pieri@auslromagna.it 3 意大利弗利 47121 Morgagni-Pierantoni 医院骨科; roberto.casadei@auslromagna.it 4 意大利罗马圣乔瓦尼阿多洛拉塔医院肿瘤内科,邮编 00184; federica.recine@irst.emr.it 5 骨肿瘤学、骨与软组织肉瘤和创新疗法科,IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli,意大利博洛尼亚 40136; toni.ibrahim@ior.it * 通信地址:silvia.vanni@irst.emr.it † 这些作者对这项工作做出了同等贡献。
摘要定量流量比(QFR)是基于侵入性冠状动脉造影图像的分数流量储备(FFR)的计算。计算QFR的侵入性不如测量FFR,并且可能与较低的成本有关。当前的证据支持呼吁对QFR和FFR进行足够动力的随机比较,以评估中间冠状动脉狭窄。favor III欧洲日本试验的目的是研究基于QFR的诊断策略是否在评估中间冠状动脉症患者的评估中,与标准FFR指导的策略相比,与标准的FFR指导策略相比,是否产生了12个月的临床结果。偏爱III欧洲日本是一个研究者引起的,随机的,临床结果,非效率试验,计划于2,000例随机2,000例患者1)稳定的心绞痛和中间冠状动脉狭窄,或2)至少在急性心肌肌肉伸肌后至少进行功能评估的指示。最多40个国际中心将使患者随机将基于QFR或基于标准的FFR诊断策略随机。主要不良心血管事件的主要终点是全因死亡率,任何心肌梗死以及12个月(12个月)的任何计划外的冠状动脉血运重建。QFR可以作为FFR的腺苷和无线替代品出现,从而使中间冠状动脉狭窄的功能评估降低了侵入性和更具成本效益。
6。Purpose of this study .................................................................................................................... 27 6.1 Rationale ............................................................................................................................................... 27 6.2 Hypothesis ............................................................................................................................................ 29 6.3项目目标................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 29
1.0 APPLICATION ...................................................................................................... 1 2.0 AFFIDAVIT ........................................................................................................... 3 3.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................... 5 4.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 7 4.1 Corporate Profile ....................................................................................... 7 4.2 Purpose .................................................................................................... 7 4.3 Background ............................................................................................... 7 5.0 RATIONALE ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... …….......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Policy Number : CS2025D0034AO Effective Date : January 1, 2025 Instructions for Use Table of Contents Page Application ............................................................................. 1 Coverage Rationale .............................................................. 2 Applicable Codes ................................................................ 19 Clinical Evidence ...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
表10:SFR的摘要....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 16表11:加密操作........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. ................................................................................... 37 Table 17: Security Requirements Mapping ................................................................................... 38 Table 18: Suitability of SFRs ......................................................................................................... 40 Table 19: Dependency Rationale .......................................................................................................................................................................... 41
Title and abstract 1 (a) Indicate the study's design with a commonly used term in the title or the abstract (b) Provide in the abstract an informative and balanced summary of what was done and what was found Introduction Background/rationale 2 Explain the scientific background and rationale for the investigation being reported Objectives 3 State specific objectives, including any prespecified hypotheses Methods Study design 4 Present key elements of study design early in the paper Setting 5 Describe the setting, locations, and相关日期,包括招聘,接触,随访和数据收集参与者的期限6(a)同类研究 - 确定资格标准以及参与者选择的来源和方法。描述随访的方法(b)队列研究 - 进行匹配的研究,给出匹配的标准以及暴露和未暴露的N/A
Phil A. Hart,医学博士1,Georgios I. Papachristou,医学博士,博士,沃尔特·G·帕克,MD 2,Anne-Marie Dyer,MS 3,Vernon M. Chinchilli,PhD 3,Elham Afghani,MD 4,M.D. 1,Kathleen M. Dungan,医学博士7,Jeffrey J. Easler,MD 8,Evan L. Fogel,MD,MSC 8,Carla J. Greenbaum,MD 9,Rita R.Kalyani,MD,MHS 10,MHS 10,Murray Korc,M. Lee, MD 1 、Jennifer L. Maranki, MD 15 、Stephen J. Pandol, MD 16 、Anna Evans Phillips, MD 17 、Jose Serrano, MD, PhD 5 、Vikesh K. Singh, MD, MSc 4 、Cate Speake, PhD 9 、Temel Tirkes, MD 18 、Frederico GS Toledo, MD 19 、Guru Trikudanathan, MD 20 、Santhi Swaroop Vege, MD 21 、Ming Wang, PhD 3 、Cemal Yazici, MD 22 、Atif Zaheer, MD 23 、Christopher E. Forsmark, MD 24 、Melena D. Bellin, MD 25 、Dhiraj Yadav, MD, MPH 26 代表 1 型糖尿病急性胰腺炎联盟 (T1DAPC)
C Transaction-specific prospectuses ...................................................17 Rationale for transaction-specific prospectuses ....................................17 When transaction-specific prospectuses can be used ..........................18 Effect of suspensions from quotation and trading halts on ‘continuously quoted securities' .............................................................20 Content requirements of transaction-specific prospectuses ................................ 21 ASIC的排除权 - S713(6)...................................................
摘要 背景/原理 基于人工智能 (AI) 的临床决策支持工具正在医学的多个领域开发,需要评估其对患者治疗和结果以及临床工作流程优化的影响。RAZORBILL 研究将通过使用自动液体和层量化测量来丰富三维 (3D) 视网膜光学相干断层扫描 (OCT) 扫描,研究先进的 AI 分割算法对新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性 (nAMD) 患者疾病活动性评估的影响。 方法 RAZORBILL 是一项观察性、多中心、跨国、开放标签研究,包括两个阶段:(a) 临床数据收集(第 I 阶段):选择观察性研究设计作为在现实世界临床环境中收集数据的合适设计,该设计既不强制严格的访问时间表也不强制要求治疗方案,以便在第 II 阶段进行评估;(b) OCT 富集分析(第 II 阶段):将对去识别的 3D OCT 扫描进行疾病活动性评估。在此次评估中,研究人员将审查丰富了分割结果(即突出显示和量化的病理液体量)和原始(即非丰富)状态的扫描。此次审查将采用综合交叉设计,研究人员将作为自己的对照,从而使分析能够考虑到专业知识和个体疾病活动定义的差异。结论为了将新型 AI 工具应用于常规临床护理,需要仔细研究其益处和操作可行性。RAZORBILL 将告知基于 AI 的临床决策支持工具的价值。它将阐明这些工具是否可以用于 nAMD 患者的临床治疗,以及是否允许优化常规临床护理中的个性化治疗。