机构名称：
¥ 1.0
一般而言，RPI被理解为具有受益或从法律诉讼中受益或获取的实体的人。In the IPR context, the PTAB's America Invents Act (AIA) Trial Practice Guide, which governs IPR and PGR proceedings, notes that “[t]he core functions of the ‘real party- in-interest' and ‘privies' requirements are to assist members of the Board in identifying potential conflicts, and to assure proper application of the statutory estoppel provisions.”[1] The Trial Practice Guide states that the PTAB is guided by common law principles and that the inquiry is “highly fact-dependent” and often considers whether entities “exercised or could have exercised control.”[2] Just a few years ago, in Applications in Internet Time ( AIT ), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit instructed that “[d]etermining whether a non-party is a ‘real party in interest' demands a flexible approach that takes into account both equitable and practical considerations, with an eye toward determining whether the non-party [3]虽然联邦巡回赛规定了PTAB的某些考虑，以评估当事方是否是RPI，但它使用广泛而非限制的语言，但最终对党派是否有一些不确定的语言来评估PTAB的某些注意事项。
真实的派对：
主要关键词
相关文件推荐
