Certain statements in this report, other than purely historical information, including estimates, projections, statements relating to business plans, objectives and expected operating results, and the assumptions upon which those statements are based, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal securities laws, including Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.In this context, forward-looking statements often address expected future business and financial performance, financial conditions and other matters, and often contain words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “opportunity,” “outlook,” “plan,” “project,” “seek,” “should,” “strategy,” “target,” “will,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” “would”以及类似的表达方式,这些单词的变化或负面因素。前瞻性陈述基于当前的期望和假设,这些期望和假设受风险和不确定性的影响,这可能会导致实际结果与前瞻性陈述有实质性差异。Dow Inc.没有义务更新或修改任何前瞻性陈述,无论是由于新信息,未来事件还是其他方式,除非证券和其他适用法律要求。引用“ Dow”或“公司”是指Dow Inc.及其合并子公司,除非另有明确指出。
此通信包含1933年《证券法》第27A条的“前瞻性陈述”,修订了1934年的《证券交易所法》第21E条,如经修订。除了历史事实的陈述外,所有陈述都包含在本沟通中,这些陈述解决了Oneok或Enlink期望,相信或预期将来会或可能发生的活动,事件或事件或发展的陈述,这是前瞻性的陈述。Words such as "estimate," "project," "predict," "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "potential," "opportunity," "create," "intend," "could," "would," "may," "plan," "will," "guidance," "look," "goal," "target," "future," "build," "focus," "continue," "strive," "allow" or the negative of such terms or other其变化以及与未来计划,行动或事件的任何讨论相关的类似物质使用的单词和术语确定了前瞻性陈述。但是,这些单词的缺失并不意味着陈述并不是前瞻性的。这些前瞻性陈述包括但不限于有关拟议交易的陈述,拟议交易的预期关闭及其时间以及对Oneok,Oneok,Ellink及其合并操作的描述在效用拟议的交易后。有许多风险和不确定性可能导致实际结果与本通信中包含的前瞻性陈述有重大不同。
Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward-Looking Statements All statements in this press release, other than statements of historical fact, are statements that could be deemed “forward-looking statements” In some cases, forward-looking statements may be identified by terminology such as “believe,” “may,” “will,” “should”, “predict”, “goal”, “strategy”, “potentially,” “estimate,” “continue,” “anticipate,” “打算”,“可以”,“会”,“项目”,“计划”,“期望”,“寻求”以及类似的表达方式和变化。iveric Bio打算将这些前瞻性陈述由安全港的规定涵盖美国的前瞻性陈述1995年的私人证券诉讼改革法案。本新闻稿包含与拟议中的“前瞻性陈述”,其中包含拟议的对艾维拉斯的生物的收购以及此类拟议的收购,阿斯特拉斯的目标,阿斯特拉斯和艾维利奇生物的信念和期望的目标和期望。 Bio,Iveric Bio的产品候选人的预期收益和成功,批准ACP的可能性和预期时间的潜力,预期的拟议收购融资以及拟议中的收购的预期时间,每种都会涉及实质性的风险和不确定性,这些风险可能会导致与那些明确或暗示的那些人属于这些表达或暗示的实际结果。此外,Astellas和Iveric Bio在竞争性和快速变化的环境中运作,并不时出现新的风险。上述因素并不详尽。Astellas and Iveric Bio have based these forward- looking statements on their current expectations and projections about future events and trends that they believe may affect the financial condition, results of operations, business strategy, short- term and long-term business operations and objectives and financial needs of Astellas and Iveric Bio, but they cannot guarantee future events, results, actions, levels of activity, performance or achievements, business and market conditions, the timing and results of biotechnology development and潜在的监管批准。您还应仔细考虑可能影响Iveric Bio业务的其他风险和不确定性,包括“前瞻性陈述”,“主要风险因素的摘要”中所述的风险和不确定性,“主要风险因素的摘要”以及“ Iveric Biio Biio在表格10-K上的年度报告”的“风险因素”部分,表格10-Q的每季度报告和其他文档的季度报告和其他时间为SECT的网站。这些文件识别并解决了可能导致实际事件和结果与前瞻性陈述中包含的事件和结果的其他重要风险和不确定性。前瞻性陈述仅在制作之日起说话。读者被告知不要不依赖前瞻性陈述,astellas和iveric Bio不承担任何义务,也不打算更新或修改这些前瞻性陈述,无论是由于新信息,未来事件还是其他方式,除非适用法律,否则
UKG 劳动力研究所发现,83% 的员工认为他们在工作中没有得到公平或平等的倾听。调查还发现,47% 的员工认为代表性不足的声音没有被听到,而 60% 的员工认为他们的观点和意见在工作场所被忽视。
Ericka Rovira等人[2]在询问有关情况控制和年龄对自动驾驶汽车的影响的文章中。想到的想法发现,高CPRS得分的人倾向于在汽车中表现出更高的信仰,而更年轻的成年人则平衡了他们对机器人化失望的下降,而不是经验丰富的成年人。关于老年人可能会从自动驾驶汽车中获得最重要的询问,但由于高度机器化水平的基本表现可能会导致无法预料的问题,因此仍然是合理的。人的身份和认知能力对比可能会影响一个人在机械化方面的表现以及如何看待它。本文重点介绍了向驾驶员提供额外数据以适当改变其与驾驶相关创新的辨别力的重要性。关于呼吁提前的思考调查如何在不可避免的小故障后使用自动驾驶汽车升级的恢复方法。
2019年,疾病控制与预防中心固定了1,282例在31个州的麻疹病例,这是美国自1992年以来报告的最多人数。这些病例中的绝大多数是没有因这种疾病而被毒死的人之一(CDC 2020)。爆发促使人们在政府应在多大程度上要求父母接种子女的辩论,特别是州政府是否应继续允许宗教豁免(Villa 2019)。尽管民意调查表明,绝大多数美国人认为应该接种疫苗以便上学,但有可能的少数美国人(约17%)认为父母有权选择。Notably, more than 20 percent of white evangelical or black Protestants (more than any other group), 25 percent of political conservatives (compared with only 9 percent of liberals), and 20 percent of Republicans (compared with only 12 percent of Democrats) believe that “parents should be able to decide not to vaccinate their chil- dren, even if that may create health risks for other children and adults” (Hefferon and Funk 2020; Kennedy 2017; Pew Research Center 2017)。对疫苗的怀疑不仅归因于文化保守主义或党派。例如,黑人和西班牙裔美国人(与
Social networks constitute an important approach in the study of animal social behaviour.So far, focus has been on statistical analysis of animal social network structures.However, social networks can also be studied by generative network models - procedures that create simulated network structures.这些模型在更广泛的网络科学中起着关键作用,但是尽管偶尔使用,但在动物行为领域尚未充分整合。We believe that generative network models have considerable unexploited potential as a tool for understanding animal social systems.在这里:1)我们提供了生成网络模型的一般介绍,包括对它们用于调查更广泛网络科学的问题的描述,关键模型特征的解释以及对常见模型的概述; 2)我们考虑有关动物社会行为研究的生成网络模型,包括有关动物系统问题的描述,可以用于研究(通过案例研究证明),概述动物行为研究的概述,这些研究使用了生成网络建模,关键模型对于动物行为研究的相关性以及如何选择用于动物社会系统研究的合适的生成网络模型。We hope that this can help to further integrate generative network models into the study of animal sociality.
