最近,人们对诊断开发性疾病(DP)(Burns,2024; Burns等,2023; Degutis&Campbell,2024; Degutis et al。,2023; Gerlach et al。,2024; Lowes等,2024; Lowes et al。,2024)。Several topics have been discussed, including how much prevalence rates of DP vary depending on inclusion cut-offs ( DeGutis et al., 2023 ), whether self-report data should weigh more than objective test scores ( Burns et al., 2023 ; 2024 ), how correlation between tests can bias prev- alence estimates ( Gerlach et al., 2024 ), and how response time data can improve diagnostic sensitivity ( Lowes等人,2024)。在这里,我们添加了有关排除标准的讨论,该讨论可用于排除面部识别术的替代解释。我们关注我们收集数据的两个标准,即中级视觉删除(即,与“低级”图像表示和“高级”对象和场景的“高级”解释联系起来的中间视觉过程的麻烦)和自闭症特征,并且我们在1479人中估算了他们的预期,以估算他们的预期,他们可以自我诊断为自我诊断的人,他们会自我诊断为您的自我诊断。取决于纳入标准,7 E 11%的DP可能出现中级视觉效果,14 E 21%