Petition for quashing of criminal charges, claiming protection of Art.194(2), relying on * PV Narasimha Rao's case that member would enjoy immunity from prosecution for accepting bribe for speaking or giving their vote in Parliament – Rejected by the High Court – Matter before the Supreme Court where the two-judge bench referred the matter to three-judge bench, who further referred to five-judges bench –五个判断力的长凳怀疑 * PV Narasimha Rao的正确性,其中多数判决认为,当立法者接受贿赂或在议会中投票时,立法者受到豁免权,而少数族裔则持有贿赂以影响立法者在议会中投票或不受艺术保护的行为,而不是由艺术保护。105(2)和194(2),并将此事提交给七名法官的长凳: